Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
摇滚青春荷尔蒙……无疑此片表达部分对重金属音乐的致敬。其实很是感慨，作为在美国发扬光大的摇滚乐，加上电影业领先全球，却很少有与摇滚乐的电影，优秀的就更加稀缺，此片偏重于重金属。
凡事都有代价，做好选择
哈哈哈哈哈神经病重金属儿童的校园生活……开车逃跑时hunter说that's metal的样子，简直让我怀疑他是Eric Martin的亲儿子，长太像，台上solo时，眼里满是星辰大海……
很傻很中二但也挺可爱的，可以给到3.5！大提琴当然可以金属，快去听听启示录！另外比较难得的是那个homecoming king居然不是个douchebag
仿佛看见了哈利波特还有贝拉。。。哈利波特重生之校园金属狂潮
朋友推荐给我的，说我肯定喜欢。一看封面我还以为是之前看的欧洲人拍的重金属在囧途，后来发现不是。看完就....感觉挺套路的吧，也挺平的。感觉就是标准的歌舞青春式青春片套了一个金属的壳子，真喜欢金属的感觉很难找到共鸣吧，主要还是青春片。一样是音乐青春片，几年前的初恋这首情歌给我的感觉要好不少，至少没这么套路化。而且....额....就最后表演的歌来说应该不算post death doom吧....就标准重金属而已...额....总之就....一般
金属乐，就是流淌在我身体里的血液！（谐音梗扣钱（
亮点是没有扯上太多青少年的sex，暴力之类的，缺点是缺乏对人内在的表现而整个过程过于肤浅，沦为美国青少年的过家家。
超喜欢吉他小哥，真的没见过这么纯粹的金属脑诶，反而觉得鼓手才是矫情的那种，又要出名又要正常还要爱情，行吧毕竟是青春片...以及那个婚礼乐队主唱也好帅的～
居然能我让我对重金属产生一种强烈的代入感，这片做到了。
没想到大提琴也可以玩重金属！大提琴手用电子大提琴出场的时候帅炸了！片中的大提琴曲目是巴赫大提琴无伴奏组曲的 suite 1, 还是很经典的。为了“过审”，乐队名字从 skullfucker 换成 skullflower 也是很有创意了。
校园青春。怪胎励志。最好的是音乐，尤其是后面比赛时那段。其它内容也就平平淡淡
货不对版啊，玩死金的画什么尸脸啊，就还是换皮的美式校园剧，加了点金属元素。初入坑的可以一看
片子里的各种经典片段听着很爽，但是剧情就有点水了。事实证明乐队还是需要个贝斯手，结局算是编剧认清了重金属在当前音乐潮流中尴尬地位~
自由的代价太高了
就是很奈飞的电影 有趣的故事拍出了无聊的电影
看完《摇滚校园》，再看这个，内核大同小异，没啥感觉，男主真他妈的作！反抗就跟小孩过家家一样，喊喊口号，语不惊人死不休！不过我们连他们一半的勇气都没有！
看个热闹。居然还请几个前辈出来跑龙套。但是总之，不用练基本功就能打到飞起的鼓手和不用排练就能上台炸场的乐队，那是做梦瞎诌。
在想，
总体来说剧情一般，但是还是蛮爽的！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
