This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
看了一半，小K演得挺好的，衣服也好看，只是这片子神经兮兮的又有些无聊，我不喜欢。我印象里戴安娜王妃是一个正面评价的女性，这片子里的却是一个恋爱脑的弃妇，在我看的二分之一里根本没有任何能让人有正面评价的表现。
相比静态的完美剧照，Stewart一开口表演细微控制还是差一些，不过比她以前的表演是强不少，不比照真人戴妃的话还行。Pablo Larrain对戴妃的诠释也没有提供新见解，纯粹是在沉浸表现自我风格。海滩那场戏是唯一比较有感觉的。
并非常规传记片，反而像心理惊悚片
矫情。而且，K的那套圣诞礼服太丑了，像个行走的马桶搋子。
塑造的斯宾塞是矫情的，小K的表演更是矫揉造作的，还好复古视听风格让片子有了亮点，最后的蒙太奇也颇显水准。
一出独角戏。Kk演技进步惊人，配乐很阴间。不是提前知道剧情，分分钟以为自己在看《闪灵》
最后真正的大餐要是换成M我就打满分（来自麦当劳粉丝的玩笑话）。建筑电影，利用空间的方式想到《闪灵》，可以说是用恐怖片的方式拍摄传记片，一个失去自由的王妃，游离于现实与想象，高超的配乐和古典的摄影，绿木太强了，一切服化道都非常优秀，只是小K没太演好，只有美了。
过满的情绪与表演先行于故事，加之故事本身十分之平，于是产生了非常割裂的感受
小k给了两种割裂的表演：第90分钟前的黛安娜和第90分钟后的黛安娜。
实际可以三星，但第一夫人珠玉在前，要扣一星。导演层面其实和第一夫人的套路几乎一样，区别在于剧本和女主的表演。剧本上难度其实更大，第一夫人有意外事件作为引领和引爆叙事的动机，也保留了一定的悬念，结构很像红白蓝的《蓝》，人物旅程比较清晰、可预见。本片则没有这样的动机，且人物是被困在原地没有动也不能动的，叙事肯定更难处理。剧本做了最大程度的努力，结尾破题也不错，可以算是及格。问题确实在女主身上。波特曼的表演和Jackie的角色也神经质和端着，但波特曼的度明显拿捏得更好。暮光女不仅有过度表演的问题，状态也不够松弛（表演状态和角色状态是可以分开的），再加上蹩脚的口音和模仿痕迹。这些细节最后造成了观感的天差地别，不得不说是表演决定成败的典型案例。
符号不会比人更生动，角色也未必就比现实中的人更鲜活。第一点是意识问题，第二点依旧关乎意识但更多则是技术问题。这部第一点做的还可以，第二点就离生动鲜活相去甚远了。
空洞无物，不知所云，小K一张口那英音听的我尴尬症要犯了，还是暮光好看。
四不像电影 对话听得也特别难受 不光是表演的原因 也是台词的过于重复和琐碎 导演想做一种风格却很难贯彻 但总体还是剧本问题 到底想表达什么？三天descent into madness?那不如像lighthouse那样拍；还是人物最终做出选择的过程？那请把过程讲的更清楚；只是心理描写？可你又脱不开周边的人和事；文艺片？这是人物传记，导演还能大于主人公不成？
年度观影：No 468
穿婚纱的那个镜头里，小k美到我傻眼。怎么说呢，居然跟王妃共情了，这不就是最近上班如坐牢的我吗？？？
音乐和服装加分。k演的这啥？全程地铁老人看手机表情。
真切的窒息感。Diana:The Insane. 小k在戏里太美了，压过了王妃本身，比较出戏，美丽也是罪过，和现实一样。PS.极致的幸福和自由果然是可乐炸鸡。
greenwood的配乐实在大赞，爵士搭配古典的复调旋律将观众瞬间拉入影片压抑的氛围，
有些镜头还蛮喜欢，但是小K演技确实不大行……
强烈的感受——Kitsch，甚至Kristen Stewart都没有什么问题，已经很拼命，怎奈电影本身实在做作之极到让人无法忍受。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
