剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 说凌青 9小时前 :

    我觉得现在同类题材的影片有很大的困境,对编导提出了更高的要求。像我很爱这类题材,看过很多作品,在几个重要角色全部出场后就已经猜到结局了,这不是我聪明,而是全凭经验。所以结果揭晓的时候没有冲击,自然就会降低观影满足感。编导真的需要好好思考要怎么讲这类故事,才能够老套路拍出新精彩。当然,作为网大,它的整体质量还是不错了。三星半。

  • 王兰月 0小时前 :

    看到片名的瞬间想起了石黑一雄1982年的同名小说《远山淡影》。小说也是一个关于自我欺骗与救赎的故事。远处模糊氤氲的山景混合着回忆将本片的氛围调整的刚刚好,严华对林音的憧憬和向往,让她可以成为她生命的延续,就像队长和画家也是一种继承。最后的芭蕾舞演出把从头到尾的氤氲全部擦去,泛出闪闪的光。这是我近期看过最好的电影。

  • 漆彦珺 1小时前 :

    后半段差了一口气,尤其是胰腺癌的事,实在是太low了

  • 桐鑫 4小时前 :

    画面4星

  • 钱智阳 5小时前 :

    比很多院线片的质量高。演员摄影配乐节奏全部在线,虽然剧情老套开场二十分钟就猜到谜底。当文艺片看的话不错。有两句台词很戳我,“梦寐以求的,唾手可得”。“人生像一条夜河,你在其中湍急而过,任你如何努力,都无法在最喜欢的地方停留”。

  • 程经纶 1小时前 :

    是以画像师为破案线的内容,和小说没有关系。最后转折的时候有点意思,但细思好像不够有逻辑。

  • 营怀绿 6小时前 :

    靠目击者聊胜于无的特征描述画成那样,还是有点不可思议

  • 甲元蝶 4小时前 :

    看了很多负面的评价,我反倒觉得本片挺好的,摄影给满分,涉及到风景的画面,都美到不行,有一种淡淡的苍凉感,和几个人物的心境挺契合。故事是差了些,不过,能够稳稳当当讲个故事,难道不好吗?!

  • 桂芝英 5小时前 :

    很朴素的悬疑片,虽不完美,但确实是很实在的电影了。

  • 章佳芝兰 1小时前 :

    昏黄的年代感,小城文工团。男主有点帅。不过剧情交待有点乱,朝夕相处的队友怎么会分不出俩人?

  • 漆雕白玉 3小时前 :

    整体的摄影、画风、构图,都很有岁月感,镜头都很唯美,转场也很流畅,故事叙述很清晰,两个女人之间的情感也很细腻。整个故事推理逻辑就不说了,可能重点在于揭开一个背后的故事吧,反转很可以,还是值得一看吧。

  • 线幻天 3小时前 :

    两分给调色和摄影。故事的情节设定到最后都不能自圆其说,人物动机非常突兀,越到后面转场越像ppt

  • 步良工 3小时前 :

    节奏,构图,光影我都喜欢,太多的意境表达,文艺气息扑面而来,但就悬疑片来说,刻意的设制镜头语言,过早的暴露了结局,败笔。

  • 钰曦 2小时前 :

    一个被枪杀的摄影师,引出十七年前,连续被杀女性案,凶手就是摄影师,那摄影师是谁杀的呢?

  • 雪涵 1小时前 :

    张欣确实是模拟画像难得的人才,为了刑侦事业贡献一生。如果有更写实的纪录片,而不是逻辑如此差的犯罪悬疑片……

  • 龚密如 1小时前 :

    故事叙述完成度很高 虽然中间桥段有杀人回忆既视感但也圆回来了主题 最喜欢的是画面 构图色调很美 很文艺

  • 相丽玉 8小时前 :

    构图是真的挺讲究,四星到五星。故事又一些薄弱,三星半。总体来说是个不错的电影

  • 杜彦露 8小时前 :

    画面,意境,摄影都很有艺术性,只是这个单薄的故事多少有点配不上这点艺术性了。国产片还是这么绞尽脑汁地探究人性中最隐秘的角落,也就别怪审查这么严格了。然后评论里面把去那些逻辑上说不过去的点就直接全归结于「为了过审」真是让人哭笑不得。

  • 晨香 0小时前 :

    从制作质感到怀旧情怀来说都很不错,故事逻辑稍稍有点粗糙,误导从一开始“女主被埋下”就部下了,这不有点不公平。不过自始至终好好讲完了这个故事,背后绕有深意,算得上是成功了。导演编剧在耐心讲故事,这个点值得鼓励。

  • 祁熠 7小时前 :

    喜欢里面的念白和台词,无论是警方队长、画像师还是舞蹈团的女孩们,每一个人都在阐释时代之下的个人选择。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved