喜剧，讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人，周旋于女友和未来岳父之间，因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人，认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).
没懂前几天这动画怎么冲到8分以上的，这么套路化又浮夸的剧情和设定，让人尴尬得抠脚。主创想讽刺的东西太多了，又只能用浮于表面的形式强行表达，呈现的效果就是整部动画里除了主角机器人(不是主角本人)之外全员智障。剧情推动看似有逻辑，但硬伤更多。这动画唯二亮点是最后服务器场景的设计和没有强行大团圆，除此之外这就是部在及格线边缘徘徊的无聊动画。
5⃣️被忽视的女性情绪、被忽视的边缘诉求唯有通过暴力才可以解决吗？结合时事 不寒而栗
当我看完这部电影 又有多少名女性遭遇了暴行呢？
角色脸谱化严重（主角，同学，家人，企业），剧情浮夸尴尬（机器人破解安全设定违反阿西莫夫定律），几处转折十分生硬，传达出来的价值也经不起质疑——表面上将原本纯social的工具转换为带有更多自主意识的pet，实质上这种与pet的互动依然以人际分享为基础，内核不变。——总之不真实也不梦幻。
类型片的框架，社会问题的里子。看到这种聚焦当下、高度理想化的电影——无论是印度的还是韩国的，在惊叹它的尺度之余，有时难免会产生粗暴而又表面的观感。但事实上，作为一名中国观众，我们并没有资格做出这样的感想，因为相类似的电影已经在我们的国度里消失了，只剩下偶尔掠过的一些隐晦的光影片段，聊以自慰。更何况，贴近的当下的问题，它又怎么会是肤浅的呢？它是最重要的——而我们，失去了最重要的东西。
立意挺好的，可是作为悬疑犯罪片来看的话，漏洞有点多。
印度女性需要被关注，真的不搞点大事，很难被倾听。或许只有在富人阶层的幼儿园发生抢劫，才惊动这么多警力人力！也头一次在电影里看到印度警察的干练，勇猛啊
2022.3.22 好故事 阿三的故事还是可以的 但是这剧情讲实话感觉有很多片子的影子 但具体说哪一部我又有点想不起来 恐怖直播 误杀2 怒火重案？本来是可以打4星的 但是想到结尾明明可以更激烈的 拍的太平平无奇了 如果有小丑那样的结局就感觉收的很好了 笑死了出警被记者拍到 让女主知道了特别行动 还有印度的配乐真是一如既往的不行 配乐这方面印度应该好好反思 我说第一个被杀的小孩怎么没有血迹 原来是真的是玩射击游戏没被杀死 经典要见总理 感觉很多片都有这样的影子 让里面的孩子们浑然不知还在看电视也是门技术 总理最后选择和女主通电话见女主 印度每16分钟就有一名妇女被强奸..是真的太夸张了
“譬如你说，这屋子太暗，说在这里开一个天窗，大家一定是不允许的。但如果你主张拆掉屋顶，他们就会来调和，愿意开天窗了。”——鲁迅
昨日周四，支持五星。本来觉得结尾太过温和、理想，转而回想，也只有在电影中才能得偿所愿。保留一丝光明，为这人间的悲苦。
那个枪本不该由她来开，那个时间本不该落后这么久…
3.5，还是一样的问题，议题很好，但是这是泄愤片。情绪的宣泄会模糊解决问题的难度，结尾的处理更是完全破坏了整个故事的基础，通过蔑视法律的方式寻求法律的完善，就非常失控。
受害者想要正义有多么困难。非要以死相逼绑架儿童你才肯听我的声音吗？
半路弃，实在太糙了，印度电影有很大可以发展的空间。
片尾字幕惊心动魄，整体可以更紧凑一些，但印度片是不是没俩小时不让上
开头入戏很快，中间一大段绑架过程和寻找真相的过程显得非常寡淡，没有啥悬念，也没觉得紧张刺激，按说这一块按宝莱坞的处理方法，可以非常精彩。感觉编剧在这一块有点问题，可能把精力都放在了细节雕琢上了。这个案子滴水不漏，几乎没有bug ，反而显得小心翼翼，放不开手脚。不过这种苦心经营，在结局的时候还是颇有成效。像强奸犯司机，从开篇要求送蛋糕时就被女主算计，中间多次呼应，最后真相时很意外，又极合理。再比如女主提出的最后一个要求虽然没有直接给出，但警察的配合很明显。
可怕的現實…但實際上不以暴制暴根本無人在意…
这样的电影真好，值得更多的人去看，在当下，它的现实意义，尤其凸显。该发出声音的时候，不要犹豫，一点点支持，也许可以改变未来，也许只改变一点点，那也比原地踏步要好很多！
结构有点类似《误杀2》，有韩国电影那味，是一部看完不失望的电影，开局就抓住了看点，使得你非常想了解她的动机和目的以及后续发展，一个普通老师以一人之力改变这个法律漏洞，演技很强。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
