Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
冲着黄政民打个三星，整体下来比咱们的解救吾先生差的可不是一点半点。
太抓马，现实感没了，人性的复杂也被打薄了。纯粹在消费黄政民的演员形象。最后进入片场的戏份有意思，可惜只是点缀。
代入感极差，私生饭要求政民念台词，阿西吧累～，原版珠玉在前，叙事节奏流畅各方面的优点，在翻拍这里都没有，反派缺个“余皑磊”式的人物。
韩国的翻拍改编的还可以不像国内直接照搬这点不错
原版本的就已經拍的不怎麼樣了 翻拍找了黃正民擔保 結果沒想到翻拍的版本更爛
不像某些人說的那麽不堪.
（翻拍得不太好其实
相比于《解救吾先生》，这次的改编彻底输了。逻辑散乱，剪辑随意。
之所以看这部电影，就是冲着黄政民来的，但是稍微有点失望。这些绑架犯有点太傻了，犯的错误太多。这就导致剧情稍弱，不够吸引人。
难得思密达那边翻拍了一部我国大陆的电影，最后电影的结尾做了个人英雄的改编，男主亲自抓住了绑匪。
虽然我喜欢看黄政民肉搏，
不过这很韩国
千亿票房巨星黄政民在本片中饰演被绑架的千亿票房巨星黄政民！剧情没有吾先生紧凑，后部分一直在拍出逃，警匪人质三方角力被淡化了，最后雨中的打戏真是黄政民最狰狞的表演了，我丁青什么时候被打成这样过？还有是不是有丁青就会有李仲久啊哈哈哈，黄政民说西巴真是很有感觉啊！可以看的爽片。
就算有黄政民滤镜也真的不行，太韩国动作警匪片套路了。
竟然翻拍自解救吾先生，先去给吾先生打个分。 感恩“卡西莫多”最后没有亲成功，不然我有可能这辈子都住在崆峒山了。 如果说忠武路还想有信誉的话，黄政民大概是我最后愿意支持的人。
[拳头][拳头][拳头]还不如王炸组合所拍摄执导的生化武器好呢[擦汗][擦汗][擦汗]
虽然国内版本都忘得差不多了 但不比不知道 演技 真的有点在华仔之上 这就很尴尬了 最后的两人对决 真的好过瘾 黄政民 yyds 请继续出演更棒的作品吧！
3星半，就算绑匪和警察都有工具化和模板化之感，但是仍模板得很成功，毕竟黄叔在我心中魅力还是挺大的，撑得起一部电影
这点让人不胜唏嘘
韩国版《解救吾先生》，黄政民原名出演，剧情情节做了部分修改！棒子国的警察办案与实战能力真是有待提高，女绑匪C罩杯，神经质的老大爷，人质自救暴力抵抗绑匪，勇敢无畏！“吴若甫事件”中主犯带的自制手雷，终于在棒子国街头炸响！哦西把！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
